127
C
hapter
F
our
:
‘Y
ou
S
hall
H
ave
the
P
oor
W
ith
Y
ou
A
lways
’ (1978 – 2002)
in clientele. Later it was the Eat-n-Run
that was started to replace the Patchwork
Auction.
The tournament was one of the
first big projects the new development
director, Ralph Lewis, undertook.
Lewis came on board October 1,
1994. Morse recollects:
I think the decision to hire a development
director was part of the wider move to
improve the board and move the agency
forward. It was clear that if we were to
provide the programs that we wanted and
were needed that a single executive working
also as the de facto development person
wasn’t going to get it done. It was pretty
clear during that time, early nineties, that I
needed more help. Donna [Puyear] started
volunteering one day a week to help in office
administration and board support. We got
a man to volunteer to help with writing and
newsletters and p/r pieces. Then we said that
as soon as we could get the money we would
get a development director and department
going. I remember I took a small night
course for a few weeks so that I could learn
more about what we should be doing and if
the time came to hire a development director
I might have better idea of what they were
supposed to do.
I was reluctant to take money from the
programs and spend it on development. It
was kind of a catch 22. You need the help
you can’t afford. I knew from the course I
took (and it turned out to be pretty true) that
it would take 3 to 5 years for a development
department to start producing a steady
stream of income that outweighed the
expenses. About that time we got money from
an estate (ca. $165,000). We took that money
to fund up front the development….
Kingdom House “welcomed Ralph
Lewis as director of development,
a position in which he will be
responsible for the overall management,
direction, and coordination of financial
development initiatives on behalf of the
agency…” According to
Missouri East
United Methodist Reporter,
the creation
of a development director position was a
response to the demand for services and
the critical reduction in support sources
and government funding.
32
Indeed, the
mid-1990s were a time of decreased
federal spending on welfare programs as
well as an overhaul of the entire system.
Under President Bill Clinton,
Congress passed the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act (Welfare Reform
Act) in 1996. The new legislation did
away with the Aid for Families with
Dependent Children (AFDC) program,
placed permanent ceilings on the
amount of federal funding for welfare,
and gave each state a block grant of
money to help run its welfare program.
As a result, social service non-profits
were pressed to offer more job training
opportunities, expand childcare and
after-school programming and address
issues the federal government was
relinquishing.
Writing on the impact of this
reform, Reverend Mark Harvey (then
at Kingdom House) described the
impact the legislation initially had at the
agency:
Missouri Legislators will decide within
the coming weeks how to implement changes
in welfare programs required by new federal
legislation. Kingdom House programs have
always focused on assisting families with the
transition from welfare to work, but cuts in
aid will likely affect Kingdom House clients
and programs greatly.
In October AFDC ended, replaced by
TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy
Families). No one is now ‘entitled’ to welfare
benefits. Most current recipients will be
required to work. Our one Employment
Placement Counselor is already swamped
with assistance requests from our clients
for available full and part-time jobs
and training to upgrade their skills for
employment that will enable them to
support their families. His secretary assists
prospective workers to prepare resumes.
Unless Governor Carnahan asks for a
federal waiver, 17,000 ‘able-bodied’ adults
in Missouri will lose their Food Stamps in
February. For many this is their sole income
D
P
hoto
:
C:
Ralph Lewis, First
Developement Director
the
creation of
a
development
director
position
was
a
response
to
the
demand
for
services
and
the
critical
reduction
in
support
sources
and
government
funding
.